next up previous contents
Next: Daytime Sprites Up: ELF measurements Previous: Introduction   Contents

Sprite Currents

At 5:38:00.77 UT on July 24, 1996, a bright sprite event was observed on video from both Langmuir Laboratory, New Mexico and Yucca Ridge, Colorado. A slow field change recorded at Langmuir was coincident with the sprite appearance in video. Red and blue photometery of the sprite event was recorded by Walt Lyons and Tom Nelson at Yucca Ridge. The position of the sprite was triangulated from the video observations. The light propagation delays to each site was subtracted from the corresponding waveforms and the result is shown in Figure 4.1.

Figure 4.1: An isolated slow electric field change recorded at Langmuir Laboratory is compared with the red and blue photometry observed from Yucca Ridge. The waveforms were temporally aligned to the triangulated position of the sprite event. The red luminosity from the sprite is strongly correlated with the electric field signature, thus proving that the sprite produced the slow field change.
\begin{figure}\begin{center}
\par\epsfig{file=eps/19960724_053800.eps, width=5in}\par\par\par\end{center}\end{figure}

The distance between the sprite and Yucca Ridge was sufficiently great ($>\!500$ km) that the parent discharge was well below the horizon and thus could not significantly contaminate the photometer signal. The strong correlation between the sprite's light output and the electric field change provides clear evidence that the sprite, not the parent discharge, was the source of the field change.

The peak in the blue photometer signal leads that in the red. This may be due to millisecond-scale timing errors which affected the blue channel (T. Nelson, personal communication, 1997). However, other measurements (Armstrong et al., 1998; Suszcynsky et al., 1998) have shown that blue emissions lead those of the dominant lower energy red emissions, indicating that significant ionization occurs during sprite generation. The identity and nature of the ionization mechanism is disclosed in Chapter 5.

Cummer et al. (1998) independently confirmed the correlation of the photometer signal with the sprite field change for 3 sprite events. Using an ELF propagation model and a vertical sprite extent of $\sim$30 km, they estimated that the sprites had peak currents (integrated across their horizontal extent) of 1.6-3.3 kA and total charge transfers of 5-42 C. Reising et al. (1999) observed that the sprite charge moment change was linearly related to the total sprite luminosity. They also noted that $\sim$20% of sprite events are accompanied by an ELF pulse. The author's observations also support this estimate.


next up previous contents
Next: Daytime Sprites Up: ELF measurements Previous: Introduction   Contents
Mark Stanley 2000-10-22